
Suppose that the free-trade price of a ton of steel is €500. (Note: € is the symbol for the
euro, a common currency used in 19 European countries, including Finland.) Finland, a
small country, imposes a €60 per-ton specific tariff on imported steel. With the tariff,
Finland produces 300,000 tons of steel and consumes 600,000 tons of steel.
What is the purpose of this €60-per-ton tariff?
Its purpose is to protect Finnish steel consumers from foreign competition.
Its purpose is to protect Finnish steel producers and consumers from the World
Trade Organization.
Its purpose is to protect Finnish steel producers from foreign competition.
Its purpose is to cause Finland to comply with provisions of the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
Suppose that the free-trade price of a ton of steel is €500. (Note: € is the symbol for the
euro, a common currency used in 19 European countries, including Finland.) Finland, a
small country, imposes a €60 per-ton specific tariff on imported steel. With the tariff,
Finland produces 300,000 tons of steel and consumes 600,000 tons of steel.
What is likely to happen to Finnish production of steel and the price of steel sold in
Finland after the €60-per-ton tariff is imposed?
Finnish steel production will fall, and the Finnish price of steel will fall.
Finnish steel production will rise, and the Finnish price of steel will fall.
Finnish steel production will fall, and the Finnish price of steel will rise.
Finnish steel production will rise, and the Finnish price of steel will rise.
Suppose that the free-trade price of a ton of steel is €500. (Note: € is the symbol for the
euro, a common currency used in 19 European countries, including Finland.) Finland, a
small country, imposes a €60 per-ton specific tariff on imported steel. With the tariff,
Finland produces 300,000 tons of steel and consumes 600,000 tons of steel.
Who will gain and who will lose as a result Finland's €60-per-ton tariff on imported
steel?
Both Finnish steel producers and steel consumers will be worse off with the tariff
than without it.
Finnish steel producers will be better off; Finnish steel consumers will be worse off
with the tariff than without it.
Finnish steel producers will be worse off; Finnish steel consumers will be better off
with the tariff than without it.
Both Finnish steel producers and steel consumers will be better off with the tariff
than without it.